“They have never known a life without the Internet, let alone computers, and many don’t know a world without mobile phones. “ (2012, Cornish, Total Girl magazine)
This was the first quote
I read when I recently attended a workshop in Texas entitled “Teaching the I Generation”. Our presenter, Bill
Ferriter, made reference to this quote by adding the words, “Digital Immigrant”
and “Digital Native” to its vernacular.
What an amazing world we live in when our students, our very children,
cannot imagine a world that isn’t plugged in.
Three weeks ago, my
mother-in-law and father, who are both in their senior years and new to
personal computer use, purchased brand new iPads. As they unpacked their new
devices, I waited nervously for the inevitable onslaught of questions. Much to my surprise, something strange
happened. My children, who were there to
witnessing their “iBirths”, jumped right in and led the way in teaching their grandparents
how to use the iPads. Within no time, both
grandparents had their own iTunes accounts and were well on the way to beating
level two of Angry Birds. I especially loved it when, in true parental form, my
mother-in-law kept asking for the instruction manual and my father kept trying
to brush off help saying he just wanted to figure it out in his own!
What was ironic on this
special day was when my children discovered my dad’s old records and record
player. It was priceless to watch my
father explain how these big black plastic discs could be used to play
music. My children armed with plenty of 21st
century savvy, were awestruck over how the tiny grooves on this plastic disk could
be transformed into music without the use of lasers. This moment in time will forever stay with
me. Watching the two generations, both
experts in their own right, seeking an explanation of how and why. Our children are growing up in a world that is
really in its infancy. Technologies are
evolving so quickly that there is very little time to be amazed, there is very
little time to really understand how we went from model 2.0 to model 5.0.
Maybe this is the curse
for the iGeneration. Windows 95… What
was that? Today, things are moving so
quickly that there is no time to stop and smell the RAM. The iGeneration is in some ways an unenviable
position because they aren’t given time to think about things in a way that
exudes awe. The new generation of XBOX
comes out next year but it probably won’t be a game changer. Children will just view at as the next new thing. I actually remember when the iPod came out. A
hard drive with music that fits in your pocket.
I could listen to over 1000 songs; out went my cd collection, in the
trash went my cassette tapes. For me,
the iPod was amazing, a true innovation, whereas for my children, they just take
it for granted. Is the pace of technology leaving our children void of a sense
of wonder and just setting them up with unfulfilling expectations for the
latest version?
What are the effects of
all this on public education?
This is a hot topic in
educational circles. What will the iGeneration
impact be on how we deliver and receive public education? In response to a need to change, many schools
are moving to a more campus style approach where students and parents are rapidly
figuring out there are many ways to acquire an education. Online education and
independent study are gaining popularity and may one day surpass traditional classroom
teaching. The problem we have with public
education is the lethargic way in which it responds to the need for change. There is such fear with changing what we’ve
always done. If we change it, what will “it” look like and what really is the
“it” we’re talking about, are questions that remain to be answered. In our
district, the online Surrey Connect model is an example of how a district can
address the need for alternate ways to deliver education. This model works well for independent
learners who need more convenience, but it still demands that teachers work in
a building and be available for additional help at set hours. When I first
heard about Surrey Connect, I imagined a system where I could teach in my
pajamas at home, a system where I would interact solely through the Internet. In my previous life as an instructor for University
of Phoenix, all online interactions were just that – strictly online.
Maybe the solution for
the iGeneration is to move past the model of delivery and perhaps focus more on
the “tools of delivery”. We were one of the first schools in Surrey to get a
massive Wi-Fi upgrade. No longer do
students have to sneak on to our wireless using the coveted “secret” password.
We now have a guest access for anyone who enters the building and we are able
to handle over 1000 devices. To augment
this change, we also invested in an iPad cart for our teachers (the fruits of a
committed team of teachers who secured a district grant for a Innovative
Learning Design project). Making
technology more accessible and open to everyone is the solution. We’re not using
technology simply to replace the overhead, as in the case of document camera,
but rather we’re using the need for technology as the drive to create infrastructure
to support its use in the educational setting. We are finally figuring out that
our vision needs to be dialed into finding better ways for the iGeneration to
plug in. Seeking better ways to innovate education and make it more relevant for
the iGeneration.
As we move forward, we will
commit to using the tools of technology to further enhance learning and further
discover more effective delivery methods of instruction for the iGeneration. In
doing this, the pace of technology will be a force we use to our advantage to actually
contribute to and create a tremendous sense of wonder in education for all our
students.
Bal Ranu
3 comments:
Hey Bal,
So much to say about this post, but I think this is the most important line in the whole bit:
"Students and parents are rapidly figuring out there are many ways to acquire an education."
In the end, the whole suggestion that schools are becoming obsolete is TRUE because we continue to hold fast to the idea that our job is to deliver information.
Considering how easy it is to access information today, that's a pretty antiquated view of just what our kids need -- and if we can't successfully rethink what it means to help students be better "learners" they're going to abandon us.
It's like we talked about in San Antonio. Parents and kids both KNOW that learning is easier -- more immediate and more customized to their own needs and interests -- OUTSIDE of school than it it IN school.
That should be enough challenge to cause us to change.
Rock on,
Bill
PS: I'm coming to Vancouver a day early in January. Maybe we can grab lunch or dinner while I'm there. Relatively free on Tuesday the 15th and the morning of Wednesday the 16th.
If we are being replaced we can stick our heads in the sand and die a quick death, chase the tech tail and die a slow prolonged death, or really sit down and grind out the "why school" question posed by Will Richardson. Will strict bell schedules, DOS system attendance and reporting, and clean hallways continue to be focus of our energy? Or will we strip away the posturing and appearances and find a reason for us and our students to continue to value "school" by providing something they cannot get online.
"Will strict bell schedules, DOS system attendance and reporting, and clean hallways continue to be focus of our energy?"
Interesting ideas. However, I started the conversation by looking at the real problems that I see with the system – mostly looking at my daughters.
Creating a system with accountability for students isn't the end of the world. Duty of care is my principal concern but I would love to see radical changes within the delivery models which would more mirror what we are looking for as we move forward.
Post a Comment